Why I DESPISE the Clintons and anyone who voted for them!

Why Clinton Bombed the Serbs - A National Disgrace Few American Even Know Nor Care About

1. To appease the Islamic world for our daily bombing of Iraq. President Clinton wanted to prove to the Muslim world that we really cared and that we were willing to destroy a Christian people to prove it.

2. The Saudis wanted the first Islamic country in the belly of Europe, and Clinton wanted cheap oil and Saudi money. The Saudis had signed a letter of intent to buy $6 billion worth of Boeing aircraft. The day after we bombed the Serbs in 1995 based on the self-inflicted Markale market place massacre by Bosnian Muslim forces, the Saudis signed on the dotted line. A coincidence? I don't think so. This is what Yossef Bodansky, author of "Bin Laden: The Man Who Declared War on America," had to say in his 1995 book, "Offensive in the Balkans:"
- "Phase Three started with the self-inflicted major terrorist provocation. On Friday 5, 1994, a major explosion rocked the Markale -- Sarajevo's main market place -- causing heavy casualties. What was immediately described as the ubiquitous "Serb mortar shell" was actually a special charge designed and built with help from HizbAllah experts and then most likely dropped from a nearby rooftop onto the crowd of shoppers. Video cameras at the ready recorded this expertly-staged spectacle of gore, while dozens of corpses of Bosnian Muslim troops killed in action (exchanged the day before in a 'body swap' with the Serbs) were paraded in front of cameras to raise the casualty count.
- "This callous self-killing was designed to shock the West especially sentimental and gullible Washington, in order to raise the level of Western sympathy to the Bosnian Muslims and further demonize the Serbs so that Western governments would be more supportive of Sarajevo's forthcoming aggressive moves, and perhaps even finally intervene military."
There were other reports from European newspapers such as The [London] Sunday Times," with headlines that read, "Serbs 'not guilty' of massacre, Experts warned US that mortar was Bosnian" (1 Oct. 1995), and "US Framed Serbs for Market Bombing," from the Stoneyhill Center, a British think tank (Oct 1995). No such headlines appeared in US national newspapers.

3. Clinton needed a new mission for NATO. The Soviet Union had collapsed and if you recall, the NATO Treaty was a collective security agreement between member nations that if one NATO nation were attacked by the Soviet Union (CCCP), other NATO members would go to its defense. In violation of International law, the NATO Treaty, the UN Charter and without the approval of Congress, Clinton and his administration, along with Serb-hating Madeline Albright, Wesley Clark, Richard Holbrooke and the rest of the Clinton gang, bombed tiny Yugoslavia that did not attack us or any NATO nation, was never a threat to us, nor did it have weapons of mass destruction.
One graphic example of Madeleine Albright's animosity towards the Serbs was the time she was entering the United Nations building as US ambassador and a Serb called out and asked why she was doing these terrible things to the Serbs. She answered, "Because they deserve it!" A more humorous account regarding Ms. Albright is the story of how the war in the Balkans really began. During a meeting of Madeleine Albright with the all-male NATO ministers, she asked the question, "Well gentleman, do we make love or do we make war?" Of course, the answer was unanimously for war.

4. Clinton couldn't let this pip-squeak of a nation defy The New World Order.

5. Our wag-the-dog president had to have a diversion from his affair in the Oval Office with a woman young enough to be his daughter.

6. Clinton also needed a war to prove he was a wartime president in the mold of FDR in order to put to rest his draft-dodging days and his contempt for the US military. The propaganda against the Serbian people has not been equalled since Hitler's Minister of Propaganda, Joseph Goebbels, said, "If you tell a big enough lie and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it." In civil wars all sides do terrible things, but in this war all blame fell on the Serbs. President Clinton was (and continues to be) the biggest con artist this nation has ever seen and it is unfortunate that the American people believed every word uttered by him regarding the events in the Balkans even though over 75% of the American people believed him to be a liar. The fate of the Serbs from Bosnia to Kosovo was sealed.

It is a sad reflection on all Americans what William Jefferson Clinton did to the Serbian people in our name. Sadder still is the realization that if he or his wife were able to run for president again he/she might very well be elected.

Blame Bush, Blame Guns, Blame anything but Cho!

Its the progressive freethinking way! I mean lets just forget about the fact the kid was sucking down Liberal mind control bullets (otherwise known as SSRI's). Lets forget about the fact he was an obvious mental case who stared at his wall without saying a word for hour after hour according to his room mate. Lets forget about the fact he wrote plays that were so disturbing school-mates and teachers recommended him for counseling.
And don't forget the fact he names his Dad twice in his play as being his molester. Noooo lets blame Bush and Heston! You want to really blame "up the chain"?
I blame the feminist movement, the Liberal agenda, the feminization and de-testosterinization of the American male by the ASA and the Public education system through medication, indoctrination, and flat out anti-Tom Sawyer brain washing! So kiss my butt all you Blame Bush for everything leftist commies and start taking credit for the demise of our country.

BBC News | Sci/Tech | Doubt cast on 'gay gene'

BBC News Sci/Tech Doubt cast on 'gay gene'

Recent post I made to a gay person looking for a Church on the craigslist religion thread:

I am sure that you have been totally indoctrinated by the currant ASA and educationally "decision" that being gay is not a choice. I would agree that some people have "tendencies" toward this behavior. There is a big difference between being part of a group of people with certain tendencies and being part of a type of people. Example: I know of plenty of ex-Gays, but I have never met an ex-Black person. The research about the supposed "gay gene" has been proven flawed many times over. The fact is that militant left has had a purposeful agenda to change the morays of our society through the ASA and public education for decades. The feminization of the American male is one of the results. That is kind of separate issue but I would argue strongly related to homosexuality. Think about how many gay men started out as boys who were fatherless, had a father who left, had an un-accepting un-loving father, and/or were abused by another male at a young age or exposed to pornography at a young age. In light of these things, any thinking person must admit there is compelling evidence that there are plenty of contributing factors that result in homosexual behavior, none of which are genetic.

My advice to you is to quit drinking the Liberal cool-aid, find a Bible and study it for all its worth and/or take a Theology course (free video base one found at bible.org)don't focus on tradition or a "Church" per say, focus on a relationship with Christ. Try to remember that Christ was not a Liberal despite what the current apostate Church may have convinced you, BUT, he does love sinners. He just hates the sin. Also know that I do not think of you as any less of a person, or worse of a sinner than myself. The only difference between you and I is that I have accepted there is a problem and that there is NOTHING I can do on my own to reconcile myself with God. I am still tempted everyday, and still sin everyday. I try very hard to turn away from sin and temptation and after almost 20 years of "willful" sin I realized what had happened and how I had drifted to the point I no longer even viewed my behavior as sin. The bible talks about "seared conscience". When one sins long enough and separates himself long enough, his conscience is dulled. Back to you, the Bible talks about an apostate Church in the end times and how right will be wrong, and wrong will be right. Think about that when you think you have found a Church that claims nothing is wrong with homosexuality.

I would seriously consider dealing with any emotional issues you might have and don't rule out physical as well. For example, I have been on medication that caused a state of very low testosterone. So I got it treated. I would consider finding a strong Bible teaching Church and stay away from revisionist Churches. Remember that there were tons of heresies during the beginning of the Church, why is today any different? I would stay away from any Church that puts works before grace and faith, or puts anything or anyone above Christ, including tradition. I would also consider doing some research into exactly why Luther and hundreds more died to reform the Church and get back to including only the Books that the Jews included in the Old Testament. I know this is a lot, but if you believe in the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob then be the best Christian you can be. No other Religion offers a way to deal with guilt through a perfect atonement. You believe this bunk science based on faulty research. The Bible has more evidence to authenticity than that, so believe it.
I recommend reading this link: http://www.ignatius.com/magazines/hprweb/austriaco_gay_gene.htm

God bless you in your search for truth. Remember the Bible says God will accept you no matter what you have done, but he expects repentance and acceptance of his son Jesus Christ.

V

PS: As far as you burning in Hell. The Bible is very clear that if one chooses to be separated by God he can be, and that God will not force anyone to be in his presence in the afterlife if they chose not to be during life. I am sure you can find a Church that will allow you to attend without addressing your lifestyle, but I guarantee you they are not teaching the whole word of God, in context, and with sound Theology. I hear there are even Churches with gay pastors now, so I am not sure why you’re asking here if that’s all your looking for. Ciao...